Initial commit of OpenSPARC T2 design and verification files.
[OpenSPARC-T2-DV] / tools / perl-5.8.0 / lib / 5.8.0 / pod / perllexwarn.pod
CommitLineData
86530b38
AT
1=head1 NAME
2
3perllexwarn - Perl Lexical Warnings
4
5=head1 DESCRIPTION
6
7The C<use warnings> pragma is a replacement for both the command line
8flag B<-w> and the equivalent Perl variable, C<$^W>.
9
10The pragma works just like the existing "strict" pragma.
11This means that the scope of the warning pragma is limited to the
12enclosing block. It also means that the pragma setting will not
13leak across files (via C<use>, C<require> or C<do>). This allows
14authors to independently define the degree of warning checks that will
15be applied to their module.
16
17By default, optional warnings are disabled, so any legacy code that
18doesn't attempt to control the warnings will work unchanged.
19
20All warnings are enabled in a block by either of these:
21
22 use warnings ;
23 use warnings 'all' ;
24
25Similarly all warnings are disabled in a block by either of these:
26
27 no warnings ;
28 no warnings 'all' ;
29
30For example, consider the code below:
31
32 use warnings ;
33 my @a ;
34 {
35 no warnings ;
36 my $b = @a[0] ;
37 }
38 my $c = @a[0];
39
40The code in the enclosing block has warnings enabled, but the inner
41block has them disabled. In this case that means the assignment to the
42scalar C<$c> will trip the C<"Scalar value @a[0] better written as $a[0]">
43warning, but the assignment to the scalar C<$b> will not.
44
45=head2 Default Warnings and Optional Warnings
46
47Before the introduction of lexical warnings, Perl had two classes of
48warnings: mandatory and optional.
49
50As its name suggests, if your code tripped a mandatory warning, you
51would get a warning whether you wanted it or not.
52For example, the code below would always produce an C<"isn't numeric">
53warning about the "2:".
54
55 my $a = "2:" + 3;
56
57With the introduction of lexical warnings, mandatory warnings now become
58I<default> warnings. The difference is that although the previously
59mandatory warnings are still enabled by default, they can then be
60subsequently enabled or disabled with the lexical warning pragma. For
61example, in the code below, an C<"isn't numeric"> warning will only
62be reported for the C<$a> variable.
63
64 my $a = "2:" + 3;
65 no warnings ;
66 my $b = "2:" + 3;
67
68Note that neither the B<-w> flag or the C<$^W> can be used to
69disable/enable default warnings. They are still mandatory in this case.
70
71=head2 What's wrong with B<-w> and C<$^W>
72
73Although very useful, the big problem with using B<-w> on the command
74line to enable warnings is that it is all or nothing. Take the typical
75scenario when you are writing a Perl program. Parts of the code you
76will write yourself, but it's very likely that you will make use of
77pre-written Perl modules. If you use the B<-w> flag in this case, you
78end up enabling warnings in pieces of code that you haven't written.
79
80Similarly, using C<$^W> to either disable or enable blocks of code is
81fundamentally flawed. For a start, say you want to disable warnings in
82a block of code. You might expect this to be enough to do the trick:
83
84 {
85 local ($^W) = 0 ;
86 my $a =+ 2 ;
87 my $b ; chop $b ;
88 }
89
90When this code is run with the B<-w> flag, a warning will be produced
91for the C<$a> line -- C<"Reversed += operator">.
92
93The problem is that Perl has both compile-time and run-time warnings. To
94disable compile-time warnings you need to rewrite the code like this:
95
96 {
97 BEGIN { $^W = 0 }
98 my $a =+ 2 ;
99 my $b ; chop $b ;
100 }
101
102The other big problem with C<$^W> is the way you can inadvertently
103change the warning setting in unexpected places in your code. For example,
104when the code below is run (without the B<-w> flag), the second call
105to C<doit> will trip a C<"Use of uninitialized value"> warning, whereas
106the first will not.
107
108 sub doit
109 {
110 my $b ; chop $b ;
111 }
112
113 doit() ;
114
115 {
116 local ($^W) = 1 ;
117 doit()
118 }
119
120This is a side-effect of C<$^W> being dynamically scoped.
121
122Lexical warnings get around these limitations by allowing finer control
123over where warnings can or can't be tripped.
124
125=head2 Controlling Warnings from the Command Line
126
127There are three Command Line flags that can be used to control when
128warnings are (or aren't) produced:
129
130=over 5
131
132=item B<-w>
133
134This is the existing flag. If the lexical warnings pragma is B<not>
135used in any of you code, or any of the modules that you use, this flag
136will enable warnings everywhere. See L<Backward Compatibility> for
137details of how this flag interacts with lexical warnings.
138
139=item B<-W>
140
141If the B<-W> flag is used on the command line, it will enable all warnings
142throughout the program regardless of whether warnings were disabled
143locally using C<no warnings> or C<$^W =0>. This includes all files that get
144included via C<use>, C<require> or C<do>.
145Think of it as the Perl equivalent of the "lint" command.
146
147=item B<-X>
148
149Does the exact opposite to the B<-W> flag, i.e. it disables all warnings.
150
151=back
152
153=head2 Backward Compatibility
154
155If you are used with working with a version of Perl prior to the
156introduction of lexically scoped warnings, or have code that uses both
157lexical warnings and C<$^W>, this section will describe how they interact.
158
159How Lexical Warnings interact with B<-w>/C<$^W>:
160
161=over 5
162
163=item 1.
164
165If none of the three command line flags (B<-w>, B<-W> or B<-X>) that
166control warnings is used and neither C<$^W> or the C<warnings> pragma
167are used, then default warnings will be enabled and optional warnings
168disabled.
169This means that legacy code that doesn't attempt to control the warnings
170will work unchanged.
171
172=item 2.
173
174The B<-w> flag just sets the global C<$^W> variable as in 5.005 -- this
175means that any legacy code that currently relies on manipulating C<$^W>
176to control warning behavior will still work as is.
177
178=item 3.
179
180Apart from now being a boolean, the C<$^W> variable operates in exactly
181the same horrible uncontrolled global way, except that it cannot
182disable/enable default warnings.
183
184=item 4.
185
186If a piece of code is under the control of the C<warnings> pragma,
187both the C<$^W> variable and the B<-w> flag will be ignored for the
188scope of the lexical warning.
189
190=item 5.
191
192The only way to override a lexical warnings setting is with the B<-W>
193or B<-X> command line flags.
194
195=back
196
197The combined effect of 3 & 4 is that it will allow code which uses
198the C<warnings> pragma to control the warning behavior of $^W-type
199code (using a C<local $^W=0>) if it really wants to, but not vice-versa.
200
201=head2 Category Hierarchy
202
203A hierarchy of "categories" have been defined to allow groups of warnings
204to be enabled/disabled in isolation.
205
206The current hierarchy is:
207
208 all -+
209 |
210 +- closure
211 |
212 +- deprecated
213 |
214 +- exiting
215 |
216 +- glob
217 |
218 +- io -----------+
219 | |
220 | +- closed
221 | |
222 | +- exec
223 | |
224 | +- layer
225 | |
226 | +- newline
227 | |
228 | +- pipe
229 | |
230 | +- unopened
231 |
232 +- misc
233 |
234 +- numeric
235 |
236 +- once
237 |
238 +- overflow
239 |
240 +- pack
241 |
242 +- portable
243 |
244 +- recursion
245 |
246 +- redefine
247 |
248 +- regexp
249 |
250 +- severe -------+
251 | |
252 | +- debugging
253 | |
254 | +- inplace
255 | |
256 | +- internal
257 | |
258 | +- malloc
259 |
260 +- signal
261 |
262 +- substr
263 |
264 +- syntax -------+
265 | |
266 | +- ambiguous
267 | |
268 | +- bareword
269 | |
270 | +- digit
271 | |
272 | +- parenthesis
273 | |
274 | +- precedence
275 | |
276 | +- printf
277 | |
278 | +- prototype
279 | |
280 | +- qw
281 | |
282 | +- reserved
283 | |
284 | +- semicolon
285 |
286 +- taint
287 |
288 +- threads
289 |
290 +- uninitialized
291 |
292 +- unpack
293 |
294 +- untie
295 |
296 +- utf8
297 |
298 +- void
299 |
300 +- y2k
301
302Just like the "strict" pragma any of these categories can be combined
303
304 use warnings qw(void redefine) ;
305 no warnings qw(io syntax untie) ;
306
307Also like the "strict" pragma, if there is more than one instance of the
308C<warnings> pragma in a given scope the cumulative effect is additive.
309
310 use warnings qw(void) ; # only "void" warnings enabled
311 ...
312 use warnings qw(io) ; # only "void" & "io" warnings enabled
313 ...
314 no warnings qw(void) ; # only "io" warnings enabled
315
316To determine which category a specific warning has been assigned to see
317L<perldiag>.
318
319Note: In Perl 5.6.1, the lexical warnings category "deprecated" was a
320sub-category of the "syntax" category. It is now a top-level category
321in its own right.
322
323
324=head2 Fatal Warnings
325
326The presence of the word "FATAL" in the category list will escalate any
327warnings detected from the categories specified in the lexical scope
328into fatal errors. In the code below, the use of C<time>, C<length>
329and C<join> can all produce a C<"Useless use of xxx in void context">
330warning.
331
332 use warnings ;
333
334 time ;
335
336 {
337 use warnings FATAL => qw(void) ;
338 length "abc" ;
339 }
340
341 join "", 1,2,3 ;
342
343 print "done\n" ;
344
345When run it produces this output
346
347 Useless use of time in void context at fatal line 3.
348 Useless use of length in void context at fatal line 7.
349
350The scope where C<length> is used has escalated the C<void> warnings
351category into a fatal error, so the program terminates immediately it
352encounters the warning.
353
354To explicitly turn off a "FATAL" warning you just disable the warning
355it is associated with. So, for example, to disable the "void" warning
356in the example above, either of these will do the trick:
357
358 no warnings qw(void);
359 no warnings FATAL => qw(void);
360
361If you want to downgrade a warning that has been escalated into a fatal
362error back to a normal warning, you can use the "NONFATAL" keyword. For
363example, the code below will promote all warnings into fatal errors,
364except for those in the "syntax" category.
365
366 use warnings FATAL => 'all', NONFATAL => 'syntax';
367
368=head2 Reporting Warnings from a Module
369
370The C<warnings> pragma provides a number of functions that are useful for
371module authors. These are used when you want to report a module-specific
372warning to a calling module has enabled warnings via the C<warnings>
373pragma.
374
375Consider the module C<MyMod::Abc> below.
376
377 package MyMod::Abc;
378
379 use warnings::register;
380
381 sub open {
382 my $path = shift ;
383 if ($path !~ m#^/#) {
384 warnings::warn("changing relative path to /tmp/")
385 if warnings::enabled();
386 $path = "/tmp/$path" ;
387 }
388 }
389
390 1 ;
391
392The call to C<warnings::register> will create a new warnings category
393called "MyMod::abc", i.e. the new category name matches the current
394package name. The C<open> function in the module will display a warning
395message if it gets given a relative path as a parameter. This warnings
396will only be displayed if the code that uses C<MyMod::Abc> has actually
397enabled them with the C<warnings> pragma like below.
398
399 use MyMod::Abc;
400 use warnings 'MyMod::Abc';
401 ...
402 abc::open("../fred.txt");
403
404It is also possible to test whether the pre-defined warnings categories are
405set in the calling module with the C<warnings::enabled> function. Consider
406this snippet of code:
407
408 package MyMod::Abc;
409
410 sub open {
411 warnings::warnif("deprecated",
412 "open is deprecated, use new instead") ;
413 new(@_) ;
414 }
415
416 sub new
417 ...
418 1 ;
419
420The function C<open> has been deprecated, so code has been included to
421display a warning message whenever the calling module has (at least) the
422"deprecated" warnings category enabled. Something like this, say.
423
424 use warnings 'deprecated';
425 use MyMod::Abc;
426 ...
427 MyMod::Abc::open($filename) ;
428
429Either the C<warnings::warn> or C<warnings::warnif> function should be
430used to actually display the warnings message. This is because they can
431make use of the feature that allows warnings to be escalated into fatal
432errors. So in this case
433
434 use MyMod::Abc;
435 use warnings FATAL => 'MyMod::Abc';
436 ...
437 MyMod::Abc::open('../fred.txt');
438
439the C<warnings::warnif> function will detect this and die after
440displaying the warning message.
441
442The three warnings functions, C<warnings::warn>, C<warnings::warnif>
443and C<warnings::enabled> can optionally take an object reference in place
444of a category name. In this case the functions will use the class name
445of the object as the warnings category.
446
447Consider this example:
448
449 package Original ;
450
451 no warnings ;
452 use warnings::register ;
453
454 sub new
455 {
456 my $class = shift ;
457 bless [], $class ;
458 }
459
460 sub check
461 {
462 my $self = shift ;
463 my $value = shift ;
464
465 if ($value % 2 && warnings::enabled($self))
466 { warnings::warn($self, "Odd numbers are unsafe") }
467 }
468
469 sub doit
470 {
471 my $self = shift ;
472 my $value = shift ;
473 $self->check($value) ;
474 # ...
475 }
476
477 1 ;
478
479 package Derived ;
480
481 use warnings::register ;
482 use Original ;
483 our @ISA = qw( Original ) ;
484 sub new
485 {
486 my $class = shift ;
487 bless [], $class ;
488 }
489
490
491 1 ;
492
493The code below makes use of both modules, but it only enables warnings from
494C<Derived>.
495
496 use Original ;
497 use Derived ;
498 use warnings 'Derived';
499 my $a = new Original ;
500 $a->doit(1) ;
501 my $b = new Derived ;
502 $a->doit(1) ;
503
504When this code is run only the C<Derived> object, C<$b>, will generate
505a warning.
506
507 Odd numbers are unsafe at main.pl line 7
508
509Notice also that the warning is reported at the line where the object is first
510used.
511
512=head1 TODO
513
514 perl5db.pl
515 The debugger saves and restores C<$^W> at runtime. I haven't checked
516 whether the debugger will still work with the lexical warnings
517 patch applied.
518
519 diagnostics.pm
520 I *think* I've got diagnostics to work with the lexical warnings
521 patch, but there were design decisions made in diagnostics to work
522 around the limitations of C<$^W>. Now that those limitations are gone,
523 the module should be revisited.
524
525 document calling the warnings::* functions from XS
526
527=head1 SEE ALSO
528
529L<warnings>, L<perldiag>.
530
531=head1 AUTHOR
532
533Paul Marquess