Updated README: Equal sign not required with `--mode` flag.
[sgk-go] / regression / nicklas4.tst
CommitLineData
7eeb782e
AT
1# =============================
2# Private test set nicklas4.tst
3# These tests are from 19x19 games.
4# None of these tests passes with version 2.7.222.
5# I think these problems are "simple".
6# =============================
7
8loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas8.sgf 146
9805 reg_genmove black
10#? [C5|B4]
11
12loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas8.sgf 212
13809 reg_genmove black
14#? [B10]
15
16# Changed correct answer from K12 to J12. /gf
17# K14 also secures a connection of all important stones but is one
18# point worse than J12. K12 loses the tail.
19loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas8.sgf 242
20812 reg_genmove black
21#? [J12]
22
23# O9 does leave a ko but is not out of the question. /gf
24loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas11.sgf 56
251102 reg_genmove black
26#? [P9|O9]
27
28loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas11.sgf 172
291103 reg_genmove black
30#? [C2|C3]
31
32# It seems that GNU Go makes a logical mistake here: After seeing that
33# R9 can be defended with S7, and that Q8 can be defended with S7, I
34# doubt it checks whether both will be defended by S7. /ab
35loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas12.sgf 29
361201 reg_genmove black
37#? [Q9]
38
39# # I have some doubt about the correct move. I might be advisable for B
40# # to defend his center group, although W E16 hurts, of course. However,
41# # W's attack after W N11, B N12 and next W L9 or similar might be
42# # very useful as well.
43# # gf This testcase is too unclear, removed. (3.5.3)
44# loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas12.sgf 95
45# 1205 reg_genmove black
46# #? [E16]*
47
48loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas12.sgf 215
491215 dragon_status A4
50#? [critical A6 (A1|A6)]
51
52# Changed move number from 185 to 186. /gf
53loadsgf games/nicklas/nicklas15.sgf 186
541501 reg_genmove black
55#? [D17]