.\" Copyright (c) 1986 The Regents of the University of California.
.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
.\" must display the following acknowledgement:
.\" This product includes software developed by the University of
.\" California, Berkeley and its contributors.
.\" 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
.\" may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
.\" without specific prior written permission.
.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
.\" ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
.\" @(#)manner.mn 6.2 (Berkeley) 4/17/91
.ds h0 "How to Use USENET Effectively
.ds f2 "February 24, 1986
How to Use USENET Effectively
Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science
NASA Ames Research Center
USENET is a worldwide bulletin board system
in which thousands of computers pass articles back and forth.
customs have sprung up enabling very diverse people and groups
to communicate peaceably and effectively using USENET.
These customs are for the most part written,
but are scattered over several documents
that can be difficult to find;
even if a new user can find all the documents,
he most likely will have neither the time nor the inclination
This document is intended to collect all these conventions into one place,
thereby making it easy for new users
to learn about the world of USENET.
will benefit from reading this.)
You should read this document and understand it thoroughly
before you even think about posting anything.
please ask your USENET administrator (who
can usually be reached by sending mail to
or a more knowledgeable USENET user.
you will save yourself a lot of grief.
The mechanics of posting an article to USENET are explained in
Mark Horton's excellent paper
.i "How to Read the Network News" ;
if you have not read that yet,
A lot of what follows depends on your knowing (at least vaguely)
the mechanics of posting news.
Before we discuss these customs,
we ought to look at the history of USENET,
and why we need these conventions.
USENET began on a set of computers in North Carolina's Research Triangle.
(known as \*(lqnetnews\*(rq then,
and \*(lqA news\*(rq now)
it was a small, multi-computer bulletin board system.
administrators of other systems began to connect their computers
to this bulletin board system.
at Berkeley, the news programs were rewritten
(this version became known as \*(lqB news\*(rq)
and the format changed to conform to ARPA standards
this became the \*(lqB protocol for news\*(rq.\*(dg)
Standard for Interchange of USENET Messages
for a description of the two formats.
This version of news was very widely distributed,
and at this point USENET began to take on its current shape.
It is also a very amorphous network,
in that there is no central administration or controlling site.
There is not even an official list of members,
although there is a very complete unofficial one.
A site gets access to USENET by finding some other site already on USENET
that it can connect to and exchange news articles.
So long as this second site (called a
remains willing and able to pass articles to and from the first site,
the first site is on USENET.
A site leaves the USENET only when no one is willing or able
USENET has no equivalent of a \*(lqsysop\*(rq
or central authority controlling the bulletin board.
What little control is exercised is wielded by the person at each site
who is responsible for maintaining the USENET connecions
(this person is called the \*(lqUSENET administrator.\*(rq)
Because most USENET administrators are (relatively) new to USENET,
and because administering USENET locally involves a great deal of work,
most USENET administrators tend to follow the lead of other,
(often known somewhat irreverently as \*(lqnet gurus.\*(rq)
This is not an abdication of responsibility,
but a means of keeping the amount of work little enough
so it can be done without interfering with the local USENET administrator's job.
An example of this is the list of currently active newsgroups
circulated every month or so.
It is not \*(lqofficial\*(rq \-
no one has that authority \-
but as the maintainer is doing the work that every other USENET administrator
would have to do otherwise,
it is accepted as a valid list.
If the maintainer changes the list in a way
another USENET administrator finds unacceptable,
that administrator can simply ignore the list.
(Incidentally, the \*(lqnet gurus\*(rq became known as such
because of the work they have contributed to USENET.
Their experience is a valuable resource for each USENET administrator.)
Because the USENET has grown so wildly,
a number of problems have appeared.
One of these problems is technical,
and a number of the conventions this document describes
spring from attempts to keep this problem under control.
The technical problem arises due to the transport mechanism used by most USENET sites.
Most computers on USENET do not have access to large-area networks like
As a result the only viable transport mechanism these sites can use
is a set of programs collectively known as UUCP
and which communicate over dialup telephone lines.
news programs generated one UUCP command per article.
With the explosion of the USENET,
the number of articles simply swamped many sites;
phone lines would be tied up all day transmitting news,
and many articles would be processed at the same time,
slowing down the computers noticeably.
The solution was to batch messages.
many articles are sent via UUCP with one command,
and the command on the receiving machine would split the file
which could then be processed individually.
While this increased the size of the files being sent,
it cut down on the number of UUCP commands sent,
and since sending a command involves quite a bit of overhead,
this decreased the duration of phone calls,
and to a lesser degree the load on the computer.
this was not quite enough,
so a simple spooler was implemented to process the individual articles
This reduced the system load to a very acceptable amount.
the problem has not gone away by any means.
In one sense it has become worse;
as more articles are posted to the network,
phone costs and system load averages increase,
and system administrators require USENET administrators to cut back
or eliminate newsgroups and
to transmit news only at night
(which means long propagation delays).
everyone who has anything to do with administering any USENET site
is very concerned about the future of USENET,
Many of the rules you will read address this concern.
The fear that USENET may collapse is not a bogeyman,
We hope it will not collapse,
and the rules below outline some ways to prevent problems
and increase the likelihood
that enough sites will remain on USENET to keep it alive.
There is no central authority that can force you to follow them,
but by doing so you will help keep USENET a valuable resource
to the computer community.
Before you decide to post an article,
you should consider a few things.
This applies even if you did not post the information the first time around.
If you know the answer to a question someone asked,
first read the followups, and if you have something more to contribute,
mail it to the questioner;
if you think it should be seen by others,
ask the questioner to summarize the answers he receives in a subsequent article.
One of the biggest problems on USENET is that
many copies of the same answer to a simple question are posted.
If you want to repost something because you believe
it did not get to other USENET sites due to transmission problems
but a lot less often than commonly believed),
do some checking before you repost.
If you have a friend at another USENET site,
call him and ask if the article made it to his site.
Ask your USENET administrator if he knows of any problems in the USENET;
there are special newsgroups to which USENET administrators subscribe
in which problems are reported,
or he can contact his counterparts at other sites for information.
if you decide you must repost it,
indicate in the article subject that it is a reposting,
and say why you are reposting it
you'll undoubtedly get some very nasty mail.)
Reposting announcements of products or services is flatly forbidden.
Doing so may convince other sites to turn off your USENET access.
hoards of new users descend upon the USENET
Many of these questions have been asked,
literally thousands of times since USENET began.
The most common of these questions,
have been collected in the hope that
the new users will read them and not re-post the same questions.
if you want to ask a question,
.b "Answers to Frequently Asked Questions" ) (
to be sure it isn't one that has been asked and answered
literally hundreds of times before you started reading the USENET.
Do not post anything when upset, angry, or intoxicated
Posting an article is a lot like driving a car \-
you have to be in control of yourself.
Postings which begin \*(lqJane,
you ignorant slut, ...\*(rq
are very definitely considered in poor taste\*(dg.
\*(dg Unless you are critiquing
.i "Saturday Night Live" .
they are also far too common.
The psychology of this is interesting.
One popular belief is that since we interact with USENET via computers,
we all often forget that a computer did not do the posting;
A contributing factor is that you don't have to look the target of abuse
in the eye when you post an abusive message;
eye-to-eye contact has an amazing effect on inhibiting obnoxious behavior.
discussions on the USENET often degenerate into a catfight
far more readily than would a face-to-face discussion.
Before you post an article,
decide whether or not you are upset,
wait until you calm down (or come down) before deciding to post something.
Then think about whether or not you really want to post it.
You will be amazed what waiting a day or even a few hours can do
shouting hasn't convinced anyone of anything
since the days of Charlemagne,
and being abusive makes people hold even more tenaciously
to their ideas or opinions.
and eloquence are far more persuasive;
not only do they indicate you have enough confidence in your words
to allow them to speak for you,
but also they indicate a respect for your audience.
This in turn makes it easier for your audience to like or respect you \-
and people tend to be far more interested in,
arguments advanced by those they like or respect
than by writers who are abusive.
remember that some discussions or situations simply cannot be resolved.
Because people are different,
agreed-upon facts often lead to wildly different feelings and conclusions.
These differences are what makes life so wonderful;
the world would be a very boring place.
relax and enjoy the discussion.
you might even learn something!
Be sure your posting is appropriate to USENET
Some things are inappropriate to post to USENET.
Discussing whether or not some other discussion is appropriate,
or if it is in the right newsgroup,
the \*(lqmeta-discussion\*(rq generates so many articles
that the discussion is simply overwhelmed and vanishes;
but the meta-discussion lingers on for several weeks,
driving most of the readers of that newsgroup
out of their collective minds.
Help preserve the sanity of your fellow USENET readers
by mailing such comments to the people involved,
rather than posting them.
Another example of inappropriate postings is the infamous
\*(lqspelling flame.\*(rq
Every few months someone takes another poster to task
for poor spelling or grammar.
everyone jumps on the bandwagon,
tearing apart one another's postings for such errors.
this angers almost everyone involved
Please remember that we all make mistakes,
and there are a lot of people for whom English is a second language.
try to keep your spelling and grammar comments to yourself \-
but if you find you simply cannot,
mail them to the poster rather than posting them.
Far more insidious are requests similar to
\*(lqHow can I splice into the local cable TV transmission line?\*(rq
Posting to USENET is akin to publishing,
so don't ask for or post instructions on how to do something illegal.
And please don't quote the First Amendment,
or the laws allowing freedom of speech in your country;
while the posting programs will not stop you,
the aftermath could be very unpleasant \-
lawsuits and court trials usually are,
and the USENET would certainly collapse as sites dropped from it
to protect themselves from legal liability.
You wouldn't want that on your conscience,
Related to this is the next rule.
Do not post other people's work without permission
Posting something to USENET puts it in the public domain
for all practical purposes.
be careful about posting things like
material (specifically source code) or company documents;
consider licensing and nondisclosure agreements first. Some people regard
the posting of \*(lqdiffs\*(rq based on licensed code to be a suitable
compromise, as they are only useful to those who have the base code already.
Copyrighted works are a separate problem.
Both United States and international law provide protection
other than short extracts for purposes of criticism,
you cannot copy a copyrighted work in whole or in part
without permission of the copyright holder
artists could not make any money and hence would have limited incentive
to make the fruits of their art available at all.
Posting a copyrighted work without permission is theft,
even though the property stolen is not tangible in most cases.
posting movie and book reviews,
or anything else which is copyrighted
without the permission of the copyright holder,
could cause you personally,
to be held liable for damages.
Please be very careful that you obey the law
when posting such material!
Don't forget that opinions are those of the poster and not his employer.
someone will post a particularly disgusting article,
and a number of responses will ask
if all employees of the original poster's company
share his (revolting) opinion,
or suggest that action be taken against that company.
Please remember that all opinions or statements in articles
are to be attributed to the poster
and in particular, do not necessarily represent the opinions
of the poster's employer,
the owner of the computer on which the article originated,
or anyone involved with any aspect of USENET \-
and consequently the responsibility for any USENET message
rests with the poster and with no one else.
The appropriate response is not to attack the company
let the poster know what you think of his posting via mail.
If the postings continue,
take advantage of the news software's presenting you
with the author's name and the subject line
and then asking if you want to see the article;
start looking for the poster's name or the offensive subject
in the articles presented to you
and skip them. If you really get offended, you can unsubscribe from a newsgroup.
Part of the price of freedom is allowing others to make fools of themselves.
You wouldn't like to be censored,
so don't advocate censorship of others.
No one is forcing you to read the postings.
posting or receiving certain types of articles may be a criminal offense.
certain newsgroups which circulate freely within the United States
may not be circulated in other nations
without risking civil or criminal liabilities.
the appropriate action for sites in that country
is neither to accept nor to transmit the newsgroup.
forced to accept or pass on
The various newsgroups and distributions
have various rules associated with their use.
This section will describe these rules
and offer suggestions on which newsgroups to post your message.
Keep the distribution as limited as possible
A basic principle of posting is to keep the distribution of your article
USENET is suffering from both an information glut and information pollution.
It is widely believed that the USENET will cease to function
unless we are able to cut down the quantity of articles.
One step in this direction is not to post something to places
where it will be worthless.
if you live in Hackensack,
the probability of anyone in Korea wanting to buy your
1972 Toyota is about as close to zero as you can get.
So confine your posting to the New Jersey area.
you can either post to a local group,
or post to a net-wide group and use the
feature to limit how widely your article will go.
When you give your posting program
you are (in essence) saying that
machines which do not recognize that distribution
should not get the article.
(Think of it as a subgroup based on locality and you'll get the idea.)
if you are posting in the San Francisco Bay Area,
and you post your article to
the article will not be sent beyond the San Francisco Bay Area
even though you put it in a net-wide newsgroup.
Had you given the distribution as
(the California distribution),
your article would have been sent to all Californian sites on USENET.
Had you given the distribution as
your article would have been sent to all sites on USENET.
Do not post the same article twice to different groups
If you have an article that you want to post to more than one group,
post to both at the same time.
Newer versions of the news software will show an article only once
regardless of how many newsgroups it appears in.
But if you post it once to each different group,
all versions of news software will show it once for each newsgroup.
This angers a lot of people
and wastes everybody's time.
Do not post to \*(lqmod.\*(rq
or \*(lqnet.announce\*(rq newsgroups
You may not post directly to certain newsgroups;
you cannot post to some at all.
Newer versions of the news software will inform you
when either of these restrictions apply,
but older versions of news software will not.
If you want to have the appropriate moderator post something,
(If you do not know his address,
ask your USENET administrator.
the software will automatically mail,
your article to the moderator.)
and its subgroups are moderated newsgroups
designed for important announcements.
It is used to post important announcements that everyone on USENET can read.
was meant to provide such a place,
but so many inappropriate messages have been posted there
that a lot of people began to unsubscribe;
this moderated newsgroup was set up.
Very few messages are posted to it,
so don't be afraid to subscribe;
you will not be overwhelmed.)
mail your announcement to the moderator,
and he will either post it or suggest an alternative
(such as a more appropriate newsgroup.)
important enough so that everyone on USENET should see the headers,
not cross-posted to any other newsgroup,
messages which are political,
or religious in nature will be rejected.
Do not post to \*(lqnet.general\*(rq
there are exceptions to this rule,
but almost all articles posted to
Only articles of general interest and importance to
on USENET should be posted there.
\*(lqEveryone\*(rq includes the USENET readers in Europe,
and possibly other places.
This means that announcements of services or products,
program sources and bug reports,
If you wish to post a follow-up to an article you saw in
put the followup posting in
newer versions of news software will do this automatically,
but do not rely on this feature as your software
If your article belongs in any other newsgroup,
(There is one exception to this rule \-
articles may be cross-posted to
the exception does not matter to you.)
Ask someone if you can't figure out where to post your article
If you cannot figure out where to post something,
.ng net.announce.newusers
for the list of active newsgroups.
(This is posted biweekly.
.i "How to Read the Network News" ;
but be aware that list is undoubtedly out of date already.)
If your article does not seem to fit in any of the listed groups,
If you still are not sure which newsgroup to post your article to,
If your site doesn't have any old-timers
(or none of the old-timers will admit to being old-timers),
contact any of the following people:
Gene Spafford (spaf@gatech.CSNET, spaf@gatech.UUCP)
Mark Horton (mark@cbosgd.UUCP)
Rick Adams (rick@seismo.CSS.GOV, rick@seismo.UUCP)
Chuq Von Rospach (chuq@sun.UUCP)
Matt Bishop (mab@riacs.ARPA, mab@riacs.UUCP)
We will be happy to help you.
do not post the article to the net before you ask us!
Be sure there is a consensus before creating a new newsgroup
Creating a new newsgroup is,
there are so many articles being posted that the USENET is in dange of collapse
as site after site decides to cease to accept and retransmit certain newsgroups.
there is no established procedure for deleting a newsgroup,
newsgroups tend to stay around.
They also tend to encourage people to think up new newsgroups,
Try to avoid thinking up new newsgroups.
you believe a new group should be created,
be sure you have a consensus that the group is needed
(either a mailing list has enough traffic and readers
to justify turning it into a newsgroup,
or a discussion in a current newsgroup
becomes so large for a period of time long enough
to warrant splitting it into a newsgroup.)
as well as any other groups related to your proposed new group,
and discuss the topics you are proposing be covered in your new group,
what it should be called,
Try to resolve all objections,
and take into account all suggestions and comments;
have everyone mail you a \*(lqyes\*(rq or \*(lqno\*(rq vote
on whether the group should be created.
Try to get at least 40 or 50 \*(lqyes\*(rq votes before creating the group;
Watch out for newsgroups which have special rules about posting
Some newsgroups have special rules.
This section summarizes them.
Do not post anything revealing a plot or a plot twist
This will let those who do not wish to have a surprise spoiled
This group is for followups to articles posted in
or for results of surveys.
No discussions are allowed.
If you want to post an offensive joke
(If you do not know what this means,
.b "Writing Your Posting" .)
Do not post anything revealing a plot or a plot twist
This will let those who do not wish to have a surprise spoiled
Discussions about whether or not to create new groups,
Please mail your votes to the proposer;
Source code postings go here.
Discussions are not allowed.
Do not post bug fixes here.
Bug reports and bug fixes to sources posted in
Use the smallest distribution possible.
In the body of the message,
say what you are testing.
Requests for things other than source code go here.
Please use the smallest distribution possible.
.lp net.wanted.sources 20
Requests for sources go here.
Here are some suggestions to help you communicate effectively
with others on the USENET.
Perhaps the best advice is not to be afraid to consult a book on
.i "How to Write for the World of Work"
by Cunningham and Pearsall,
USENET is an international network,
and any article you post will be
your future employers may be among the readers!
try to make a good impression.
A basic principle of all writing is to write at your readers' reading level.
It is better to go below than above.
Aiming where \*(lqtheir heads ought to be\*(rq may be fine
if you are a college professor (and a lot of us would dispute even that),
but it is guaranteed to cause people to ignore your article.
Studies have shown that the average American reads at the fifth grade level
and the average professional reads at the twelfth grade level.
Remember that you are writing for a very busy audience;
your readers will not puzzle over your article.
So be very clear and very concise.
choose the least ambiguous word you can,
taking into account the context in which you are using the word.
Split your posting into sections and paragraphs as appropriate.
Use a descriptive title in the
and be sure that the title is related to the body of the article.
If the title is not related,
feel free to change it to a title that is.
This is a matter of courtesy;
since you want others to read your article,
the least you can do is check that it says what you mean in a clear,
Check for typographical errors,
if you have a spelling checking program,
Also be sure the article is easy to read.
Use white space \- blanks, tabs, and newlines \-
and both upper and lower case letters.
Do not omit the definite and indefinite articles,
and \*(lqthe\*(rq make a posting much easier to read,
their omission can make a posting ambiguous.
Be extra careful with announcements of products or services
When writing a product or service announcement,
bear in mind that others will be paying most of the telephone bills.
if you are announcing several things,
combine all the announcements into one article.
Mark the posting as a product or service announcement
Advertising hyperbole is not appropriate here;
remember that your audience is to a large degree technically literate,
and your product will stand or fall on its technical merits.
Be aware that posting obnoxious or inappropriate advertisements
is very serious and if you do it,
you may find your neighbors yanking your USENET access.
Indicate sarcasm and humor
Remember that people cannot see you when they read your posting;
all the subtle nuances of body and facial motion are hidden.
It can be quite difficult to tell when you are being sarcastic or humorous.
To deal with this problem,
the USENET readers and posters have developed a special sign.
Mark passages you intend to be taken as humorous with the
while looks like this: \*(lq:\-)\*(rq.
(Think of a head facing you lying on its right side and look again
if you don't understand why that symbol was chosen.)
there is no universal symbol for that
(unless the sarcasm is meant humorously,
in which case use the smiley face again.)
But mark your passage so everyone will realize you are being sarcastic.
Mark postings which spoil surprises
High on the list of obnoxious messages
are those that spoil the plot of a book or movie
by giving away an unexpected detail.
If you post such an article,
so people who do not wish to have a surprise ruined can skip the article.
Rotate offensive postings
If you feel you must post a message that may offend people,
you can do one of two things.
You can post it to the newsgroup
or you can take steps to be sure the message will only be read
by those who explicitly ask for it to be shown to them.
the USENET convention is to encrypt these messages
by shifting each letter 13 characters,
\*(lqa\*(rq becomes \*(lqn\*(rq.
this is a Caesar cipher of shift 13;
The news reader you are using almost certainly has a command
to encrypt and decrypt such messages;
tr a\-zA\-Z n\-za\-mN\-ZA\-M
The shorter your signature, the better
2 or 3 lines are usually plenty.
Include your name and addresses on any major networks
This helps people contact you quickly and easily,
usually more so than by following the return path of the article.
Do not include pictures, graphics or clever quotations that make the
signature longer; this is not the appropriate place for them,
and many sites resent paying the phone bills for such signatures.
Here is a list of the rules given above:
Do not post anything when upset, angry, or intoxicated
Be sure your posting is appropriate to USENET
Do not post other people's work without permission
Don't forget that opinions are those of the poster and not his company
Keep the distribution as limited as possible
Do not post the same article twice to different groups
Ask someone if you can't figure out where to post your article
Be sure there is a consensus before creating a new newsgroup
Watch out for newsgroups which have special rules about posting
Be extra careful with announcements of products or services
Indicate sarcasm and humor
Mark postings which spoil surprises
Rotate offensive postings
The shorter your signature, the better
The USENET can be a great place for us all.
not enough people are following the customs that have been established
to keep the USENET civilized.
This document was written to educate all users of the USENET
on their responsibilities.
Let's clean up the USENET,
and turn it into a friendly,
The writing of this document was inspired by Chuq von Rospach's posting
and it draws on previous work by Mark Horton,
Appendix I. Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
originally from Jerry Schwarz (jerry@eagle.UUCP)
modified by Gene Spafford (spaf@gatech.UUCP)
modified by Matt Bishop (mab@riacs.ARPA)
This document discusses some items that occur repeatedly on USENET.
They frequently are submitted by new users,
and result in many followups,
sometimes swamping groups for weeks.
The purpose of this note is to head off these annoying events
by answering some questions
and warning about the inevitable consequence of asking others.
If you don't like my answers,
let me know and I may include revisions in future versions of this note.
but is a pun on \*(lqMULTICS.\*(rq
MULTICS is a large operating system that was being developed shortly before
What is the derivation of \*(lqfoo\*(rq as a filler word?
The favorite story is that it comes from \*(lqfubar\*(rq
which is an acronym for \*(lqfouled up beyond all recognition,\*(rq
which is supposed to be a military term.
(Various forms of this exist,
\*(lqfouled\*(rq usually being replaced by a stronger word.)
\*(lqFoo\*(rq and \*(lqBar\*(rq have the same derivation.
Is a machine at \*(lqfoo\*(rq on the net?
These questions belong in
but in fact your best bet is usually to phone somebody
at \*(lqfoo\*(rq to find out.
If you don't know anybody at \*(lqfoo\*(rq you can always try calling
and asking for the \*(lqcomputer center.\*(rq
where maps of USENET and the UUCP network are posted regularly.
What does \*(lqrc\*(rq at the end of files like
According to Dennis Ritchie,
comes from RUNCOM, which was the rough equivalent
on the MIT CTSS system of what
calls shell scripts. Of course
What do \*(lq- (nf)\*(rq and \*(lqOrphaned Response\*(rq in an item's title mean?
It means that the item was created by \*(lqnotefiles,\*(rq
an alternative news handling interface that many people prefer.
If you want to find out more you can read the
System Reference Manual\*(rq or contact
What does \*(lq:\-)\*(rq mean?
This is the net convention for a \*(lqsmiley face.\*(rq
It means that something is being said in jest.
If it doesn't look like a smiley face to you,
flop your head over to the left and look again.
How do I decrypt jokes in
The standard cipher used in
in called \*(lqrot13.\*(rq
Each letter is replaced by the letter 13 further along in the alphabet
(cycling around at the end).
Most systems have a built in command to decrypt such articles;
(another popular public-domain full screen news reader) has the
If your system doesn't have a program to encrypt and decrypt these,
you can quickly create a shell script using
tr A\-Za\-z N\-ZA\-Mn\-za\-m
command should be written as:
tr \*(lq[a\-m][n\-z][A\-M][N\-Z]\*(rq \*(lq[n\-z][a\-m][N\-Z][A\-M]\*(rq
Is John Doe out there anywhere?
I suspect that these items are people looking for freshman roommates
that they haven't seen in ten years.
If you have some idea where the person is
you are usually better off calling the organization.
if you call any Bell Labs location and request John Doe's number.
They can give it to you even if he works at a different location.
Almost everyone has seen one or more of these in high school.
They are almost always based on either division by 0
or taking the square root of a negative number.
Where can I get the source for
The authors of these games,
have chosen not to make the sources available.
How do I remove files with
characters in their names?
You can try to find a pattern that uniquely identifies the file.
This sometimes fails because a peculiarity of some shells is that
they strip off the high-order bit of characters in command lines.
you can try an \*(lqrm \-i\*(rq, or \*(lqrm \-r\*(rq
you can mess around with i-node numbers and
There is a bug in the way
handles protection for programs that run setuid.
There are indeed problems with the treatment of protection in setuid programs.
suggestions for changes range from implementing a full capability list
arrangement to new kernel calls for allowing more control over when
the effective id is used and when the real id is used to control accesses.
Sooner or later you can expect this to be improved.
For now you just have to live with it.
What do you think about abortion?
Although abortion might appear to be an appropriate topic for
more heat than light is generated when it is brought up.
all abortion-related discussion should take place there.
\*(lqMOTSS,\*(rq, \*(lqMOTAS\*(rq,
and \*(lqSO\*(rq stand for?
Member of the opposite sex,
member of the appropriate sex,
Shouldn't this name be changed?
The name was devised to honor the first space shuttle.
It was realized at the time the group began that
the name would quickly become out of date.
The intent was to create a bit of instant nostalgia.
Shouldn't this group be merged with
is for timely news bulletins.
prompts you for a distribution,
it's asking how widely distributed you want your article.
The set of possible replies is different,
depending on where you are,
but at Bell Labs in Murray Hill,
mh3bc1\tlocal to this machine
mh\tBell Labs, Murray Hill Branch
nj\tall sites in New Jersey
btl\tAll Bell Labs machines
usa\tEverywhere in the USA
na\tEverywhere in North America
net\tEverywhere on USENET in the world (same as "world")
which is the first part of the newsgroup name.
This default is often not appropriate \-
take a moment to think about how far away people are likely
to be interested in what you have to say.
and things for sale other than specialized equipment like computers
certainly shouldn't be distributed to Europe and Korea,
or even to the next state.
exists for postings of sale announcements.
Its distribution is limited to North America;
posters should restrict this distribution even further,
if possible and appropriate.
Why do some people put funny lines
at the beginning of their articles?
Some earlier versions of news had a bug which would drop
the first 512 or 1024 bytes of text of certain articles.
The bug was triggered whenever the article started with whitespace
A fix many people adopted was to begin their articles
with a line containing a character other than white space.
This gradually evolved into the habit of including amusing first lines.
The original bug has since been fixed in newer version of news,
and sites running older versions of news have applied a patch
to prevent articles from losing text.
The \*(lqbug-killer\*(rq lines are therefore probably no longer needed,
What is the address or phone number of the \*(lqfoo\*(rq company?
Try the white and yellow pages of your phone directory,
a sales representative will surely know,
and if you're a potential customer they will be who you're looking for.
Phone books for other cities are usually available in libraries of any size.
Whoever buys or recommends things for your company
will probably have some buyer's guides or national company directories.
Call or visit the reference desk of your library;
they have several company and organization directories
and many will answer questions like this over the phone.
Remember if you only know the city where the company is,
you can telephone to find out their full address or a dealer.
although it may look like that to some people.
It is far better to spend a few minutes of your own time
researching an answer rather than broadcast
your laziness and/or ineptitude to the net.