inserting a zero-length mbuf for address in the sockbuf for a

routing socket makes us nervous; remove extraneous protsw entry.

SCCS-vsn: sys/net/rtsock.c 7.11

diff --git a/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c b/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c
index c234368..28408e9 100644 (file)
--- a/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c
+++ b/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c
@@ -34,8 +34,8 @@
 
 #include "machine/mtpr.h"
 
 
 #include "machine/mtpr.h"
 

-struct sockaddr route_dst = { 0, PF_ROUTE, };
-struct sockaddr route_src = { 0, PF_ROUTE, };
+struct sockaddr route_dst = { 2, PF_ROUTE, };
+struct sockaddr route_src = { 2, PF_ROUTE, };

 struct sockproto route_proto = { PF_ROUTE, };
 
 /*ARGSUSED*/
 struct sockproto route_proto = { PF_ROUTE, };
 
 /*ARGSUSED*/


@@ -591,11 +591,6 @@ struct protosw routesw[] = {
   raw_input,   route_output,   raw_ctlinput,   0,
   route_usrreq,
   raw_init,    0,              0,              0,
   raw_input,   route_output,   raw_ctlinput,   0,
   route_usrreq,
   raw_init,    0,              0,              0,

-},
-{ 0,           0,              0,              0,
-  raw_input,   0,              raw_ctlinput,   0,
-  raw_usrreq,
-  raw_init,    0,              0,              0,

 }
 };
 
 }
 };